Category Archives: Inside the Case

Inside the Case: Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

Case:

Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

The Supreme Court will hear Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison in January. Here to explain this layered bankruptcy case are Professor Adrian Walters of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law and Judge Timothy Barnes of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Unite Here v. Mulhall: Inside the Case

Case:

Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall

Professor César F. Rosado Marzán of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law discusses the background and legal issues involved in Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall, a unique labor relations case being argued at the Supreme Court next week.

Inside the Case: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action

Case:

Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action

The Supreme Court will decide on another affirmative action case this Term. Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, though, is different from the previous Term’s case in its central premise. Learn the background of the case from Professor Vinay Harpalani of Chicago-Kent College of Law.

Inside the Case: McCutcheon v. FEC

Case:

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission

The case McCutcheon v. FEC will be argued on Tuesday, October 8. This is the biggest campaign finance reform case since Citizens United was decided in 2010. Learn the facts behind the case from ISCOTUS Director and Professor Carolyn Shapiro of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law.

Salinas v. Texas: When does the Self-incrimination Clause apply?

Case:

Salinas v. Texas

Prof. Sanford Greenberg discusses the Supreme Court’s upcoming review of whether the Constitution’s protection against self-incrimination applies before an individual has been arrested or read his rights.

Assn. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad: Can human genes be patented?

Case:

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

Prof. Lori Andrews discusses an upcoming intellectual property case dealing with whether human genes can be patented.

Maryland v. King – DNA and the Fourth Amendment

Case:

Maryland v. King

Prof. Richard Kling describes Maryland v. King, where the Court will consider when the Fourth Amendment permits DNA searches of accused felons.

Florida v. Jardines – Dog Sniff Searches at Homes

Prof. Douglas Godfrey discusses Florida v. Jardines, a Fourth Amendment case and the second of two cases heard by the Court this week concerning drug-detecting police dogs.

Florida v. Harris – Dog Sniff Searches and Probable Cause

Case:

Florida v. Harris

The Court is expected to hear two cases this week dealing with the use of police dogs trained to detect drugs. Prof. Sanford Greenberg discusses the first of these cases, Florida v. Harris.

Fisher v. University of Texas – The Arguments

Case:

Fisher v. University of Texas

The Court will release the audio recording of the arguments in yesterday’s widely followed affirmative action case on Friday. Below, Profs. Carolyn Shapiro and Sheldon Nahmod discuss the arguments made by each side in this case.