Category Archives: Predicting the Winners

Predicting the Winners in Mellouli v. Holder and Wellness Int’l Network v. Sharif

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Wednesday. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method and all of my predictions this Term, click here.  I found both of today’s cases difficult to predict. Mellouli v. … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Mellouli v. Holder and Wellness Int’l Network v. Sharif

Predicting the Winners in Mach Mining v. EEOC and Kellogg Brown & Root v. Carter

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Tuesday. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method and all of my predictions this Term, click here. Mach Mining v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission asks whether and to … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Mach Mining v. EEOC and Kellogg Brown & Root v. Carter

Predicting the Winners in Reed v. Gilbert and Oneok v. Learjet

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Monday, the first cases for 2015. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method, see my post on last Term’s Aereo case. For all of my predictions this Term, … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Reed v. Gilbert and Oneok v. Learjet

My Record in Predicting Supreme Court Decisions: Still Perfect

As 2014 draws to a close, the Supreme Court has finished with its announcement of decisions for this year.  The Court issued opinions in 2 cases this week: (i) affirming (8-1) the decision in Heien v. North Carolina that reasonable mistakes about the law by police officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment and (ii) … Continue reading My Record in Predicting Supreme Court Decisions: Still Perfect

Predicting the Winners in US v. Wong and US v. June

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Wednesday, both involving whether equitable tolling applies to claims against the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method, see my … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in US v. Wong and US v. June

My Perfect Record in Predicting Supreme Court Cases–So Far

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed down its first two decisions of the Term.  As SCOTUSblog reports, the Court reversed the 9th Circuit decision regarding overtime pay in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk and affirmed the 8th Circuit’s decision regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b)’s bar on juror-related evidence in Warger v. Shauers.  Both decisions … Continue reading My Perfect Record in Predicting Supreme Court Cases–So Far

Predicting the Winners in Gelboim v. Bank of America and ADOR v. CSX

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two fairly technical cases on Tuesday, one involving the appeal of a dismissal of an action that has been consolidated with other actions that are still ongoing and the other involving the the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976.  Indeed, this week, the Court is knee deep … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Gelboim v. Bank of America and ADOR v. CSX

Predicting the Winners in Direct Marketing v. Brohl and DOT v. AAR

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two fairly technical cases on Monday, one involving the Tax Injunction Act and the other involving the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Direct Marketing v. Brohl and DOT v. AAR

Predicting the Winners in Young v. UPS and Hana Financial v. Hana Bank

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Wednesday, one involving the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the other involving trademark law. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method, see my post on last Term’s Aereo case.  For all … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in Young v. UPS and Hana Financial v. Hana Bank

Predicting the Winners in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries and Whitfield v. U.S.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases on Tuesday, one involving trademark law and the other, criminal law. I’m predicting the winners of the Supreme Court cases based on the number of questions asked during oral argument. For more about this method, see my post on last Term’s Aereo case. B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis … Continue reading Predicting the Winners in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries and Whitfield v. U.S.