Weekly Roundup – June 11, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

What did the Court’s decision in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action mean? Professor Vinay Harpalani explains the case and its implications

A New York Times reporter could face jail time for refusing to reveal a source, now that the Supreme Court has refused his case

Voting rights will be back in the Supreme Court spotlight next Term with a new case out of Alabama

The Supreme Court unanimously decided the Arkison bankruptcy case in a way that encouraged an “expansive view of jurisdiction”. Learn about the case from our video

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup – June 4, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

Are you a fan of Oyez’s case summaries and accessibility? Thanks to a grant from The Knight Foundation, their efforts can now begin expanding to state courts. First up: Texas!

Why was last week’s Supreme Court decision about Bush protesters decided in favor of the Secret Service? Professor Heyman unpacks the decision in this video

Professor Nahmod goes in depth on the Court’s decision in the case of officers who used deadly force during a dangerous car chase

The Supreme Court’s decision may be the final word in a precedent-setting case – but the Justices keep editing when every word counts

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup – May 28, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

Who needs the Supreme Court? Gay marriage might become the law of the land without it

“Intellectual disability is a condition, not a number,” Justice Kennedy said in ruling for a Florida death row inmate

The Supreme Court held that Secret Service agents have qualified immunity. Learn more about the background of this case from Professor Steven Heyman

“Brown has always lived in the shadow of the bold expectations it has inspired.” Professor Schmidt on Brown v. Board of Education‘s complicated legacy

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup – May 21, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

Brown v. Board of Education, 60 Years Later

Brown has always lived in the shadow of the bold expectations it has inspired.” Professor Schmidt on Brown v. Board of Education‘s complicated legacy

Saturday marked the 60th anniversary of the decision to desegregate schools in Brown v. Board of Education. Did you know the case took almost two years to decide? Find out more from our director and the argument transcripts

Education Week on Brown v. Board of Education at 60: New Diversity, Familiar Disparities

US Courts website offering resources about landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision

Continue reading

Why Brown v. Board of Education Disappoints – And Why That’s Not All Bad

Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 school desegregation ruling, turned 60 this past week. This anniversary was much like previous ones, equal parts commemoration and lamentation. If there is a consistent theme to Brown anniversaries over the years, it is this: Brown promised much, but only partially delivered. Brown is a chronic underachiever. From the day it was announced, the Brown decision has been a repository of unmet expectations. Brown has always been both inspiration and disappointment. Indeed, they are two sides of the same coin.

Continue reading

A Look Back at Brown v. Board of Education

In honor of the sixtieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, Oyez and ISCOTUS are posting the transcript from the two rounds of oral arguments that led up to the May 17, 1954, ruling.

Here is a quick setting of the scene. The first round of arguments took place in December 1952. The Chief Justice at this time was Fred Vinson, who had written important decisions striking down segregation in higher education two years earlier but who was an uncertain vote when it came to segregation in grade schools. He was an active questioner during oral arguments. Other notably engaged justices were Felix Frankfurter, who sympathized with desegregation as a cause but was unsure whether the courts should take a leading role; Stanley Reed, a Kentuckian who was the most personally uncomfortable of the brethren with the prospect of racial integration; and Hugo Black, an Alabaman who had by this point renounced his past support for segregation (including membership in the Ku Klux Klan) and come out as a strong believer that segregated schools violated the Constitution.

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup – May 14, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

“The perception that partisan politics has infected the court’s work may do lasting damage to its prestige and authority and to Americans’ faith in the rule of law.” A thoughtful piece on partisanship in the High Court from Adam Liptak

In one poll, the Court’s ratings are up with both Democrats and Republicans – while another poll says the public wants more transparency and less politics in the Court

The 2014 Supreme Court term is adding up. Keep track of new cases granted on Oyez

The Supreme Court will not rule on a contentious gun control case

Might public dissatisfaction lead to changes at SCOTUS?

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup – May 7, 2014

Did you miss your Supreme Court news this week? Let our Weekly Roundup help. (To stay on top of the latest Supreme Court happenings, follow ISCOTUS on Twitter.)

Town of Greece v. Galloway

The Supreme Court held that prayer before a town council meeting is constitutional. Professor Christopher Schmidt of IIT Chicago-Kent takes you Behind the Decision of Town of Greece v. Galloway

The Supreme Court ruled that public prayer before town council meetings in Greece, NY does not violate the Establishment Clause. Learn more about the case in our Deep Dive

The Court’s opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway on the Establishment Clause

Continue reading

Town of Greece v. Galloway: Behind the Decision

On May 5, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Town of Greece v. Galloway. The decision held that under the Establishment Clause, public prayer before a town council meeting was constitutional. Professor Christopher Schmidt (IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law) explains the decision and its facets.

For more on this case, please visit the Oyez Project/ISCOTUS Deep Dive.