• Schwartz on Nautilus and Limelight

    by  • May 1, 2014 • Faculty Commentary, Multimedia • 0 Comments

    [Reposted from ISCOTUSnow]


    Cases: Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

    On April 28, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., and two days later, the Court heard argument in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. These two patent cases have important implications for intellectual property law. Professor David Schwartz explains the issues and background of both cases.

    Find the video on YouTube here.

    About

    The purpose of the C-K Faculty Blog is to provide a forum that brings together all the rich intellectual contributions of the Chicago-Kent faculty and to encourage respectful and scholarly dialogue within the extended Chicago-Kent community, including faculty, students, alumni and colleagues at other law schools and universities. For questions or more information, contact the C-K Faculty Blog Editor by e-mail at facultyscholarship@kentlaw.iit.edu.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *